After the last victories in wars (1973), terror against Jews in the land of Israel has steadily increased. Maybe irregularly with fluctuations during minor wars – not victories, and also idiotic imposed measures like the "Oslo" and "disengagement" plans. – Until today’s catastrophe, 07.10.2023. All this time, there was a cry within the country about the need to combat terror. If we assess by which actions this cry was accompanied: liquidations and imprisonments of terrorists, then we must admit that terror has won in this war. The social base of terror has expanded. The ideas of justifying terror by Islam have been strengthened among the masses. This state – the support of terror by the main mass of the Arab population of Israel, confirms that the methods of fighting were insufficient and flawed. In view of the same trends of the expansion of terror in the international community, it can be stated that the fight against terror has been totally lost. This confirms the necessity of eradicating terror in "one, particular country". The legitimacy of such a task setting follows from the perspective of the possible destruction of the people and the state of Israel. Who is to blame and why? - is not discussed here. We repeat. The threat to the existence of the people and the state requires necessary and sufficient measures to eradicate terror in the land of Israel. An urgent law is needed, defining these measures. By the way, what are the interested parties from the coalition busy with now? Continuing to saw the budget? In the legal aspect, it is necessary to "equalize" the rights of the terrorist and the victim. Also, to satisfy European and other well-wishers, ensure a "proportional" response to terror.

The Law on Terror. (draft)

1. Individual terror. Any act of terror implies, on one side, a terrorist who wishes and is ready to kill the victim. Which he does. On the other side – a victim, a person who does not have hostile intentions. The terrorist "has the right" and the opportunity to kill the victim. The victim does not have the means or the opportunity to protect themselves in most cases. Punishment for the terrorist. What is voiced on behalf of the current politicians - the death penalty. This is what may seem like a punishment to people with quite mediocre intelligence. In many cases, the terrorist is killed during the attack and he is prepared for it. In other cases, sometimes he remains unpunished. Therefore, a special norm is expedient - the terrorist is outlawed. Then, even if he remains alive, he will be branded and not for long. This legitimizes the actions of the special services. This is not enough neither from the point of view of "equalizing" rights, nor from the point of view of a vector towards reducing terror. The killing of the victim also causes suffering to the family and not only. Accordingly, bringing the terrorist’s family to responsibility is justified and should be inevitable. For example, with a minimum norm – deportation outside of Israel.

2. Similar norms should be developed for group terror and terrorist organizations.

3. The law should be retroactively applied, for example, from 11.09.2001.

That is, Yigal Amir remains in prison until the end of his days. Abu Mazen will stop paying bonuses to terrorists. And the peaceful residents of Gaza must prove that they did not dance on the roofs on September 11, 2001, and that there are no terrorists in their families.

B. Nudelman 01.11.2023